Why some pharmacies have gone down the rabbit hole

In a nation where the pharmacist’s role has changed so much over the last 50 years, the role of the pharmacy’s board of directors has not.

They have gone through a period of consolidation.

In recent years, pharmacy boards have been merging, or merging with another pharmacy, in a bid to cut costs and increase profits.

And the board has also been a source of controversy.

In some cases, the boards have even been caught selling drugs that are illegal.

The Pharmacy Board of Australia has been criticised for allowing this to happen and even making it difficult for the public to know if drugs have been approved.

But what is the pharmacy board?

A pharmacy board is a business board set up to manage the management of a pharmacy.

It has the authority to make rules for the supply of medicines, prescribe medications, manage the pharmacy and pay wages to the pharmacy.

The board can have an independent chairman and it has the power to approve a number of decisions, including what drugs to stock in the pharmacy, which medicines to supply and what prices to charge.

But there is another important role, the chair.

They are responsible for the overall health and safety of the business and the general public.

They oversee all aspects of the health and wellbeing of the community.

They must be honest and transparent.

Pharmacy boards are independent of the government.

They can be set up by the health minister and, in most cases, they can only be created after the state government’s consent.

The Health Minister is responsible for managing the board and it’s the role he plays that has the greatest influence on what is going on.

In the case of the South Australian Pharmacy, the Health Minister made a number the decisions about the board.

The South Australian Government is the largest employer of pharmacists in the state.

It’s the first to have a pharmacist board.

It took the board public last year and was granted an emergency charter.

The charter was created to protect the health of South Australia’s 1.4 million people.

It is a law passed by the State Parliament in 2012.

Pharmacists have been fighting the Pharmacy Boards Act, which was passed in 2016, for years.

In 2018, the Pharmacists Federation of Australia, the largest union of pharmacy and pharmacy-related workers in Australia, submitted a submission to the Federal Government that called for a change in the Pharmacies Act to allow a pharmacy to be established independently.

The submission was rejected.

Pharmacist unions are recognised as stakeholders in the health care system and therefore they can have influence over what is happening in a health care setting.

The Australian Pharmacists Association, the biggest body for pharmacists, is currently considering what it would like to see happen.

In a statement, the AMA said: Pharmacy services are critically important for people in our community.

We support and believe in the importance of a pharmacists board and the health, safety and well-being of our members and members of the public.

It remains to be seen what changes the government will make to the Pharmates Act to provide the best possible environment for pharmacians.

But the AMA has a history of pushing for better access to health care.

It supported the passage of the National Pharmacy Access and Cost Review in 2015 and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in 2017.

Both are measures that provide better access and more choice for people.

The AMA’s role is to ensure that the best and most cost-effective options are available to our members, customers and stakeholders.

It also provides education, research and advocacy to support its members and other stakeholders.

The pharmacy board’s role and role in health care is important.

It plays an important role in the community and is part of the system.

But it’s important that the pharmacy board has the best chance of providing the best care for all patients.

In 2017, the Australian Medical Association voted to support the Pharmacist Boards Act.

It said: We have supported this legislation because we believe that there is an urgent need to ensure the best outcomes for patients and our communities.

It was introduced in the Federal Parliament in 2016.

Pharmacies across Australia have been meeting for the first time in the last five months to consider the changes.

The final decision about the Pharmacts Act will be made by the Pharmactical Council of Australia (PCA), the organisation that represents pharmacy practitioners and the government that regulates them.

It will decide on the final wording and the wording will be based on a number, which will be negotiated between the Commonwealth and the states.

There are some areas where pharmacy boards are different to the ones in Australia.

For example, there are many different pharmacies that have taken part in the national pharmacare pilot and there is a very different pharmacy board in each state and territory.

In Tasmania, the PCA has decided to give the same rules and regulations to all pharmacy boards, whether they are in Tasmania or not.

However, there is also a difference in the regulations and the terms of reference for the two